@thevantagepoint
Strengthening Equity & Inclusion Through Organizational Capacity

Strengthening Equity & Inclusion Through Organizational Capacity

Strengthening Equity & Inclusion Through Organizational Capacity

Culture: People First

by Vantage Point | Sep 11, 2020 | 0 comments

Last year, the Vantage Point board and staff annual retreat culminated in a new 5-year strategic plan. It felt big, it felt like a stretch, it felt pretty amazing. The first of 5 Strategic Goals (or BHAGs - Big Hairy Audacious Goals, as I see them) stated that by 2025 Vantage Point will be a leading contributor to equitable, inclusive, and sustainable practices in the not-for-profit sector, especially in lifting and strengthening Indigenous, underrepresented, and emerging not-for-profit leaders in BC.

We have focused our first year towards this goal in learning, in being humble about what we don’t know, and courageous about taking steps, individually and as an organization, to activate the learning. As a team we’ve committed to learning from the experts through the Strategem Conference virtual workshops, hosted by Cicely Blain Consulting, including introductory learning in anti-oppression, inclusive language, racial justice, and LGBTQ2S & inclusion. We will work through the Decolonizing First Workbook together as staff and board, through facilitated workshops with Michelle Nahanee.

As part of the learning journey, we are honoured to introduce our new Organizational Consultant, Dorla Tune. I am immensely excited to learn alongside Dorla in our work to strengthen not-for-profit organizations in BC through our training, planning, and consulting supports. Dorla connects her leadership experience to her commitment to strengthening equity and social justice through organizational capacity building:

Over the past 20 years, I have worked in a variety of different not-for-profit organizations. From transition houses to child welfare, from settlement agencies to philanthropy, and grassroots community development organizations. In each of these workplaces, people are the most important component; the people doing the work and the people receiving the services. Often, not-for-profit organizations are full of individuals bringing their lived experience and passion to the work in hopes of improving the lives of others. Lived experience and passion are critical to providing meaningful experiences to communities, yet they need to be nurtured and channelled through systems of organizational capacity to have the desired impact.

For me, joining Vantage Point as an Organizational Consultant means I get to work with other not-for-profits to improve their capacity systems all in service to people. Leadership, governance, training, mentoring, and strategy are only relevant if people remain at the center of the work. Not-for-profit organizations hold critical spaces in the community. We are in a time when the deconstruction of colonial and racist systems is non-negotiable. How effectively not-for-profit organizations do their work in service to improving lives, requires their organizational capacity to be rooted in equity and social justice.

I am excited to join Vantage Point, a place where I can continue to deepen my knowledge while sharing my skills and experiences in the not-for-profit and charitable sectors. Looking forward to seeing you soon! 

Author

Maria Turnbull

Maria Turnbull brings over 20 years of leadership experience in staff and director roles within the not-for-profit sector, both here in Canada and in the UK. With a BA in International Relations and MBA, Maria is a skilled facilitator and consultant in board governance, organizational development,...

Related Posts

Strengthening Equity & Inclusion Through Organizational Capacity

Our Take on the Budget 2021 Consultation Report

Our Take on the Budget 2021 Consultation Report

Culture: People First

by Vantage Point | Sep 3, 2020 | 0 comments

Earlier this summer, we shared with you our second written submission to the Select Standing Committee on Finance and Government Services (the Committee) for the provincial budget 2021 consultation, which took place this year between June 1st to 26th. The consultation process started with the Minister of Finance’s consultation paper, which outlined the provincial government’s COVID-19 action plan and three guiding priorities: 1) health and safety, 2) immediate supports for individuals, and 3) business and economic recovery.

The Committee released the Report on the Budget 2021 Consultation on August 21st with 124 recommendations (full list found on page 106 to 119).

How to read the report

Before diving into the details, keep in mind that $1.5 billion of the $5 billion COVID-19 action plan has been earmarked for economic recovery but remains unallocated. While the COVID-19 pandemic’s impacts are unquestioned and underscored throughout the report, the Minister informed the Committee that many of the government’s priorities remain the same (see page 7 “Minister of Finance Briefing”):

  • K to 12 education
  • Childcare
  • Advanced education and skills training
  • Infrastructure (ex. roads, hospitals, schools)

Therefore, it is no surprise that these themes are represented throughout the report. Further, it is worth taking a moment to celebrate that this year’s consultation process had the highest participation level in nearly 10 years! The Committee heard and received 281 presentations, 1362 submissions, and 3624 survey responses.

The recommendations span over 12 themes, each making up a section in the report. Each theme/section has its own sub-sections that include impact of COVID-19, survey highlights (if any), detailed discussions, and the Committee’s recommendations for each theme.

Highlights

In Vantage Point’s submission, our three recommendations emphasized the opportunity for budget 2021 to be an investment in public wellbeing through funding and partnership with the not-for-profit sector.

Reconciliation, equity, diversity, and inclusion

The Committee made the explicit call to action for the upcoming budget to “address inequities and make significant progress on reconciliation, diversity and inclusion, and accessibility” in all areas. Further, the Committee recommends “ensuring ministries adopt a diversity and inclusion lens and recognize systemic barriers to address the disproportionate impacts of the pandemic, and providing programs and supports for equity-seeking groups who face systemic barriers” (see the executive summary on page 2).

Similar points about the importance of gender equity, truth, reconciliation, and decolonization were incorporated throughout Vantage Point’s submission. The not-for-profit and charitable sector is comprised of organizations working to advance similar goals every day and the Committee’s recommendations validate the importance of the work made possible by our sector.

Digital connectivity

The necessity of internet access, reflected in Vantage Point’s recommendations, is another clear theme in this report. The report recognizes inequities related to digital infrastructure and “recommends accelerating investments…including addressing challenges related to affordability” and references this is an area requiring collaboration with the federal government and telecommunication companies.

Multi-year stabilization funds

While the report does not make an explicit recommendation for a not-for-profit sector stabilization fund (Vantage Point recommended a $500 million stabilization fund for the sector), it does suggest a need for urgent recovery funding and multi-year stabilization supports to several sectors.

To note, “non-profit” or “not-for-profit” is mentioned 19 times in total throughout the report. It has its own sub-section under the “Health” theme, and an entire recommendation based on it:

  • Recommendation 65: Provide urgent and stable funding to the charitable and non-profit sector so that they can continue to provide services to British Columbians, including exploring the provision of incentives to donate such as a donation-matching program, and increasing the charitable donation tax credit.

It is not only a pivotal moment that not-for-profits are mentioned, moreover, “non-profit” is recognized as a whole sector. This is welcomed language for those in the sector who have and continue to define the sector and raise its profile.

However, the report falls short to include not-for-profits in the Economic Development section. As mentioned in our submission for the Provincial Budget Consultation, BC’s not-for-profit sector contributes $6.4 billion to the provincial GDP. Jobs and service provisions, as well as losses in this sector need to be seriously considered in the context of a resilient provincial economy.

Other recommendations with implications on the sector

While the not-for-profit sector as a whole is only directly referenced in two themes – first in Health, and secondly, in Social Services, Community Social Services and Social Policy - there are several recommendations for other sectors that could impact BC’s not-for-profits whose work is related to those sectors. These include:

  • Arts and culture: targeted, multi-year recovery funding through BC Arts Council. Donation incentives, tax breaks, infrastructure investments. Increased funding for Creative BC and Amplify BC. Work with other levels of government and community partners to increase investments.
  • Digital media, music, film: explore new measures to address inequities and barriers for underrepresented groups in this industry.
  • Long-term care: sustain investments, especially for staffing and care standards.
  • Mental health and addiction services: invest in continuum of services, culturally safe supports and services, family supports, services for children and youth.
  • Housing: accelerate construction of continuum of affordable and social housing, especially for women facing violence, gender-specific supportive housing, expanded housing options for people with disabilities, youth, and low-income seniors. Expand investments in Indigenous housing with Federal Government.
  • Public safety and justice: increase investments in legal aid and community restorative justice programs. Provide operational funding to child and youth advocacy centres.
  • Childcare: invest in affordable childcare, and funding through Ministries of Children and Family Development and Health to improve access to supports for children and youth with accessibility needs, and their families.
  • Youth: improving supports for youth aging out of care and marginalized youth. The report names Boys and Girls Club, and Right to Play as organizations to provide care and wrap-around programs for marginalized youth.
  • Advanced education: increase adult education resources, including broadening course offerings and skills training (especially important because of COVID-19 and other disruptive workplace forces that could displace workers).
  • Social services: develop a comprehensive, outcome-focused social policy framework. Continue funding provincial poverty reduction strategy. Review the framework for income and disability assistance. Address recruitment, retention, and compensation challenges within community services sector.
  • Fiscal and regulatory policy: apply a gender-based analysis plus lens in policy development and economic recovery, as well as “equity, reconciliation, and climate action lenses”. Ensure federal and provincial programs continue supporting individuals and businesses in recovery. Transition emergency funding to targeted investments that are based on individual and sectoral needs. Review opportunities to temporarily adjust the Employer Health Tax. Introduce a municipal finance reform so there are more tools to address financial pressures related to housing issues, the opioid crisis, and other priorities.

Now what?

Budget 2021 will be presented on the third Tuesday in February (Feb 16, 2021). While the release of the report ensures the public can access the Committee’s recommendations, it is important to recall this report is written and has been submitted to members of BC’s legislative assembly. If you want to engage with your MLA about this report and budget 2021, make sure you are familiar with the Lobbyists Transparency Act.

Overall, the report recognizes many of the key points raised in our recommendations for the sector, namely that there is an immense financial impact due to COVID-19 and strong need for stabilization supports. The report also echoes the reality that the pandemic has revealed the need for resources to address gaps in supports and services for British Columbians. These are all encouraging signs that budget 2021 may reflect the needs and supports we have collectively identified for our sector.

If you want to get further involved in these discussions and the advocacy work that Vantage Point is doing, we encourage you to become a member. During the COVID-19 crisis we have made membership free. You can learn more and sign-up here.

Author

Joyce Lin

Joyce is the Sector Development Coordinator for Vantage Point - she facilitates the foundational work involved in Vantage Point’s goals to contribute to a healthy and thriving not-for-profit sector in BC. On any day, she is monitoring and sharing information that will support sector success and...

Related Posts

Strengthening Equity & Inclusion Through Organizational Capacity

Revenue Recognition For Contributions NPO

Revenue Recognition For Contributions NPO

Planning: Strategy & Workforce

by Vantage Point | Aug 3, 2020 | 0 comments

This blog was originally posted on the Manning Elliott website, and written by Patrick Chan and Brandon Kelley.


Within Part III of the Handbook - Accounting Standards for Not-for-Profit Organizations, Section 4410 provides guidance on revenue recognition for contributions which are non-reciprocal transfers to an NPO, the most common example being government funding.

Contributions are Classified Into Three Different Types

i) Restricted Contributions

Externally imposed stipulations that specify how the resources or assets must be used.

ii) Endowment Contributions

Externally imposed stipulations that specify the resources must be maintained permanently; the NPO only has access to use the income generated from the endowment.

iii) Unrestricted Contributions

Neither a restricted nor endowment contribution. An NPO can make an accounting policy choice to recognize contributions revenue using either the deferral, or restricted fund method.

Deferral Method

Under the deferral method, unspent restricted funding accumulates as a liability and is presented as deferred contributions on the statement of financial position.

  • Endowment contributions are recognized as direct increases in net assets.
  • Restricted contributions are deferred and recognized as revenue in the same fiscal periods as the related expenses are incurred.
  • Restricted contributions for the purchase of capital assets are deferred and amortized into revenue on the same basis as the acquired capital asset. Funding received for capital assets that won't be amortized is recognized as direct increases in net assets.
  • Unrestricted contributions are recognized as revenue immediately upon receipt of funds.

Restricted Fund Method

Under the restricted fund method, an NPO presents a general fund and one or more restricted funds in their financial statements. Revenues reported in a restricted fund must be externally restricted by a third party.

  • Endowment contributions are recognized as revenue of the endowment fund.
  • Restricted contributions are recognized as revenue in the corresponding restricted fund. If no corresponding restricted fund exists, the restricted contributions are recognized in the general fund in accordance with the deferral method.
  • Unrestricted contributions are recognized as revenue of the general fund.

Example

An NPO received $100,000 of restricted contributions funding during the fiscal year, $60,000 has been spent and $40,000 remains unspent at year end.

The table below illustrates the impact to the financial statements when using the deferral or restricted fund method under this example. The restricted fund example assumes a corresponding restricted fund exists.

Statement of Financial Position

Deferral Method Restricted Fund Method
Cash $40,000 $40,000
Deferred contributions $40,000 $Nil
Net assets $Nil $40,000

Statement of Operations

Deferral Method Restricted Fund Method
Revenue $60,000 $100,000
Expenses $60,000 $60,000
Excess of revenues over expenses $Nil $40,000

 

We Are Here to Help

 

Manning Elliott is here to help. Visit our blog to stay up to date on the most recent NPO topics. To learn more about revenue recognition for contributions or to submit an inquiry, please contact a member of our NPO.


The above content is believed to be accurate as of the date of posting. Tax laws are complex and are subject to frequent changes. Professional advice should be sought before implementing any tax planning. Manning Elliott LLP cannot accept any liability for the tax consequences that may result from acting based on the information contained therein.

Author

Manning Elliott

Manning Elliott is a CPA firm with offices located in Vancouver, Burnaby, Surrey, and Abbotsford British Columbia, Canada. We provide personalized accounting and business advisory services to companies operating within a wide range of industries in seven major practice areas: Tax, Private Company...

Related Posts

Strengthening Equity & Inclusion Through Organizational Capacity

Our Letter on BC’s Recovery

Our Letter On BC's Recovery

Culture: People First

by Vantage Point | Jul 16, 2020 | 0 comments

The Government of BC has asked for feedback on their discussion paper, BC’s Recovery from COVID-19This is a great opportunity to influence BC's recovery. We are sharing some resources for not-for-profits who would like to provide input. Vantage Point sent the letter below to provide our input on the importance of investing in not-for-profits for the recovery. The deadline to for input is Tuesday, July 21, at 4pm.

Ways you can provide input:


Letterhead Header

The Honourable John Horgan, Premier of British Columbia

Office of the Premier
West Annex Parliament Buildings
Victoria, BC V8V 1X4

The Honourable Minister Carole James
Minister of Finance and Deputy Premier
Room 153 Parliament Buildings
Victoria, BC V8V 1X4

July 10, 2020

RE: Now more than ever, is the time to invest in BC not-for-profits.

Dear Premier Horgan and Minister James:

Thank you for the opportunity to provide input on how best to invest the $1.5 billion Economic Recovery Fund. I am writing to you today on behalf of Vantage Point and our member organizations. We are a charity based in Vancouver, BC on the unceded territories of the Skwxwú7mesh (Squamish), Səl̓ílwətaʔ (Tsleil-Waututh), xʷməθkʷəy̓əm (Musqueam), and shíshálh (Sechelt) nations. Vantage Point supports not-for-profits and charities across the province with leadership development, board training, strategic planning, and more. We represent over 545 not-for-profit members from 48 communities across the province.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the not-for-profit sector has been devastating and requires your urgent attention and action. Vantage Point’s research on COVID-19’s impact on the sector clearly confirms troubling impacts on not-for-profit organizations and the communities we serve. The research documented an increased demand for community services as well as a massive loss of income. The most worrisome estimates suggest that one in five not-for-profits will not survive this crisis.1 Closures of this scale will have irreparable impacts on BC’s economy and communities. The people who depend on these services, often some of the most vulnerable people in society, face increased risks of falling through the cracks. While our sector is innovative and resilient, our capacity to navigate COVID-19 is has reached a breaking point.

Not-for-profits are critical to the lives of people in British Columbia. As we adapt to different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, BC's not-for-profits and charities continue to provide a critical level of support to the Government of British Columbia, businesses, and the public. We provide everything from the provision of health and other essential frontline services, to supporting victims of domestic violence, to deploying volunteers safely, to providing arts and culture services. The not-for-profit sector has long been recognized as vital to ensuring the safety and wellbeing of our province. We are an essential safety net for the most vulnerable individuals in our communities. From all angles, an investment in the not-for-profit sector aligns with the key values outlined in the recovery consultation discussion paper.

We acknowledge the remarkable work the BC Government has done to support our communities during the extremely challenging environment of the COVID-19 crisis. We have been encouraged by your explicit acknowledgement that “supporting… not-for-profits throughout the pandemic is vital to BC’s response to and recovery from COVID-19.”2 We have also been pleased to know that your Economic Recovery Task Force includes representation from the not-for-profit sector. We encourage you to continue deepening and expanding this engagement to ensure that the full breadth of not-for-profits expertise is adequately reflected in your consultations, advisory groups, and recovery planning efforts.

Recommendation One: Create a $500 million stabilization fund for the not-for-profit sector

Following our recommendations for the Budget 2021 consultation, we insist that a $500 million stabilization fund for the not-for-profit sector is required to ensure that organizations can survive, adapt to new circumstances, and position themselves to actively contribute to our recovery. A stabilization fund of this magnitude is critically important to sustain not-for-profits.

Current measures announced by the Federal and Provincial governments have failed to recognize:

  • the unique situation facing charities and not-for-profits
  • the efforts not-for-profits have continued to make to serve their communities in unprecedented circumstances, and
  • the distinct role that not-for-profits must play in our recovery from COVID-19.

Make funding flexible: It is critically important that stabilization funding is truly flexible and allows not-for-profits to allocate funding where they need it most. Current funding and granting systems often limit spending in our organizations solely on direct program delivery without strengthening our operational capacity. These systems also burden organizations with rigorous reporting requirements. Funding restrictions often cause not-for-profits to drift from their mandate as they often are forced to adapt to evolving funding priorities. These restrictions create precarious working conditions and stifles investments in employee benefits, stable governance, and adequate resources for efficient operations.

Commit to gender equity: We know that gender equity is a priority for the BC government. A stabilization fund will ensure women, who make up 74% of the not-for-profit sector, stay employed. Further, this will allow organizations that serve women and other populations who experience discrimination, oppression, and violence, to continue safely providing services in-person and virtually. Not-for-profits are leaders in anti-racism and social justice work, they are also providers of community-based health and wellbeing programs.

Invest in not-for-profits to stimulate the economy: We encourage you to think of stabilization funding and stimulus spending beyond customary criteria narrowly focused on business, employment, and “shovel-ready” projects.

Invest in not-for-profits to support public health: A stabilization fund of this magnitude would be equivalent to an investment in public health and prevention. These investments can help ensure British Columbians are supported to recover from the mental health effects of prolonged isolation, depression, and stress. It will also help address other healthcare crises, such as the recent increase in opioid overdoses, from worsening.

Partner with well-established and trusted funders: We recommend that a not-for-profit stabilization fund be administered through networks of funders with deeply established relationships with local not-for-profits and charities. Examples of such funders include provincial community foundations such as Victoria Foundation, Vancouver Foundation, United Way, and Vancity Community Foundation. It is particularly important to direct funding to organizations and funders that are led by and are working with Black, Indigenous, People of Colour (BIPOC), and others who face systemic discrimination.

Municipal and regional governments also have well established relationships and partnerships with charities and not-for-profits within their jurisdictions. Funds distributed through municipalities and explicitly earmarked for supporting their local ecosystem of not-for-profit organizations could help strengthen local economies and reduce the load on other municipal and provincial services.

Recommendation Two: Use an equity lens to invest in province-wide internet access, connectivity, and infrastructure

We echo the views in the Building BC’s Recovery Together report of the urgent need for province-wide internet access.

We urge the BC Government to immediately invest in affordable high-speed internet in rural communities, households across BC, and not-for-profit organizations and housing providers. We encourage you to work with network service providers to create equitable access to internet. We encourage you to remove network deployment barriers and use government assets effectively to reduce costs and accelerate the expansion of connectivity in rural BC. As you develop plans for these investments, we encourage you to uphold your commitments towards a Gender Based Analysis Plus (GBA+) framework as a way to ensure equitable access and connections for all, particularly for women, BIPOC, and other underrepresented communities.

We ask that you make funds available for not-for-profits to access reliable and adequate technology as this is one of the key impacts and barriers of COVID-19 on the sector. We encourage you to improve and update funding systems such as the rules for BC’s Community Gaming Grants to allow more flexibility for funds to be used for training and updating technology.

Work with the not-for-profit sector

Once again, we thank you for allowing us to join fellow British Columbians in sharing what is most important for our community’s wellbeing going forward. We urge you to work with the not-for-profit sector to strengthen public wellbeing and stabilize our economy. We look forward to continuing to contribute towards our province’s recovery through constructive investment and partnerships with the Government of British Columbia.

Sincerely,

Alison Brewin
Executive Director, Vantage Point
T: (604) 637-8207 E: abrewin@thevantagepoint.ca
www.thevantagepoint.ca

cc: Minister of Jobs, Economic Development and Competitiveness, Hon. Michelle Mungall Minister of Labour, Hon. Harry Bains Mr. Spencer Chandra Herbert, Vancouver-West End Riding

 

[1] Vantage Point (2020). No Immunity Report. Retrieved from https://www.thevantagepoint.ca/blog/no-immunity-impacts-covid-19-our-sector

[2] Government of BC. (2020). Budget 2021 Consultation. Retrieved from https://www.leg.bc.ca/content/CommitteeDocuments/41st-parliament/5thsession/fgs/Budget2021Consultation/Budget_2021_Consultation_Paper.pdf

 

Letterhead Footer

Author

Alison Brewin

As Executive Director, Alison Brewin is responsible for executing the Vantage Point’s mission and vision. Alison graduated with a Law Degree from the University of Victoria in 1991 and was called to the Bar in 1992. Throughout the 1990s, she worked in non-profit management, as political assistant...

Related Posts

Strengthening Equity & Inclusion Through Organizational Capacity

Our BC 2021 Budget Submission

Our BC 2021 Budget Submission

Planning: Strategy & Workforce

by Vantage Point | Jul 2, 2020 | 0 comments

This year was Vantage Point’s second time making a submission for the BC Budget Consultation to the Select Standing Committee on Finance and Government Services. Of course, this year looked very different than other years, with the COVID-19 pandemic playing a major role in the way we approached our recommendations.

To prepare this submission we gathered input from our members, spoke to BC not-for-profit umbrella organizations, co-led a virtual gathering of 90 not-for-profits leaders that came together to speak to the budget process. We also reflected on many other convening conversations about COVID-19 we’d held since March 2020 and the input from 1119 BC not-for-profit leaders that were documented in our No Immunity Report.

We were heartened to see that the Budget 2021’s Consultation Paper stated that “supporting… not-for-profits throughout the pandemic is vital to BC’s response to and recovery from COVID-19.” We advocated that the not-for-profit sector is in fact essential to ensure the wellbeing of individuals and communities in British Columbia.

In this submission we ask the Provincial Government to:

1. Create a $500 million stabilization fund for the not-for-profit sector

Not-for-profits have been heavily called upon to assist those impacted by the COVID-19 crisis – through access to food, housing, mental health supports, and other necessities. We urged the Provincial government to invest in the not-for-profit sector to ensure not-for-profits will survive this crisis. Both front line organizations directly supporting those affected by pandemic, to arts and culture organizations that are so critical for wellbeing.

2. Use an equity lens to invest in province-wide internet access, connectivity, and infrastructure

Now more than ever, the world is relying on internet and mobile access. We heard from many not-for-profit organizations of the urgency to address this issue in BC. Especially for vulnerable populations and rural communities, some services can only be accessed virtually.

3. Invest in the Ministry of Citizens’ Services to create a home for the sector in government

In our budget submission last year, we recommended that the Government of British Columbia establish a home for the not-for-profit sector in government. We recognize that some not-for-profits operate under the jurisdiction of certain ministries, but there are vast portions of the sector that do not have a central ministry to turn to for direct collaboration with government and support. We argued that now is a critical time that calls for clear lines of communication between the Provincial Government and the not-for-profit sector.

We encourage you to read the full submission and reach out to Omar Dominguez at odominguez@thevantagepoint.ca with any feedback.

Author

Vantage Point

We are a team of passionate and dedicated not-for-profit professionals dedicated to providing not-for-profits with high quality leadership training. We are here to set you up for success. Learn more about our team at www.thevantagepoint.ca/about/our-people/

Related Posts

Strengthening Equity & Inclusion Through Organizational Capacity

Charitable Donations – Tax Receipts & Fair Market Value

Charitable Donations - Tax Receipts & Fair Market Value

Board: Effective Governance

by Vantage Point | Jun 18, 2020 | 0 comments

This blog was originally posted on the Manning Elliott website


The most important benefit that Canadian registered charities receive is the ability to issue "official donation receipts." When a donation is made to a charity, the charity has the ability to issue a donation receipt which will be tax-deductible to the donor.

Although a charity is not legally required to issue a donation receipt, it usually does so as an incentive to donors. The charity must issue receipts with very specific information.

The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) suggests that registered charities issue receipts by the last day of February of the calendar year that follows the year of the donation. This allows individual taxpayers to claim their donations on their annual income tax returns.

When Can a Charitable Donation Receipt be Issued?

Before a charitable donation receipt can be issued, a charity must first determine if the donation is a gift. A gift is a donation that is given freely, and not as a result of an obligation. In addition, the gift has to be a transfer of property, i.e., a gift of service is not eligible for a donation receipt.

Split Receipting

Split receipting is required when a charity receives a donation but provides an advantage to the donor (an advantage being when the donor receives something in return for the donation). Therefore the amount on the donation receipt is reduced by the value of the advantage provided to the donor. For example, if a charity gala ticket costs $300, but the value of the meal and entertainment provided is $100, the charity would issue a donation receipt for $200.

There is an exception from split receipting when the advantage is less than $75 or 10% of the donation, whichever is less. In that case, a receipt can be issued for the full value of the donation, meaning no reduction is required.

No receipt can be issued if the advantage exceeds 80% of the donation, as the CRA considers the donor to have no real intention of making a gift.

How to Determine Fair Market Value

To determine the eligible amount of a gift for tax purposes, a charity must know the fair market value of the donation, as well as the fair market value of the advantage provided to the donor, if any. If a charity is unable to determine the fair market value of either the gift or advantage, a tax donation receipt cannot be issued.

The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) indicates that fair market value, "is usually the highest dollar value you can get for your property in an open and unrestricted market and between a willing buyer and a willing seller who are knowledgeable, informed, and acting independently of each other."

For gifts of $1,000 or less, someone within the charity with knowledge of the gift may determine the value of donated goods for tax purposes. However, if the gift is to be appraised at an amount higher than $1,000, then it is strongly recommended by CRA that an independent, professional appraiser prepare a donation appraisal report to determine the value of the gift. The donation receipt should also show the name of the appraiser who established the value.

A record of how the fair market value was determined should be maintained by the charity. A charity cannot issue an official donation receipt in the name of anyone but the true donor. The name and address of the donor must appear on the tax donation receipt, in addition to several other key pieces of information.

Donation Receipt

The 12 key areas that need to be completed on an official donation receipt are as follows:

  1. Receipt number;
  2. Charity name;
  3. Charity address;
  4. Charity registration number;
  5. Date of the donation;
  6. Donor's first name, initial, and last name;
  7. Address of the donor;
  8. The total amount of the gift received;
  9. The eligible amount of the gift received for tax purposes (which takes into account the FMV and any advantage);
  10. The date the receipt was issued;
  11. Location the receipt was issued; and
  12. Authorized signature of the charity.

If the gift is non-cash, some additional items need to be included on the donation receipt, such as the description of the donation and, if applicable, the appraised amount and the appraiser's name.

We are Here to Help

Manning Elliott is here to help if you have any questions about tax receipting and fair market value as it relates to charitable donations. To submit an inquiry, please contact a member of our NPO team.


The above content is believed to be accurate as of the date of posting. Tax laws are complex and are subject to frequent changes. Professional advice should be sought before implementing any tax planning. Manning Elliott LLP cannot accept any liability for the tax consequences that may result from acting based on the information contained therein.

Author

Manning Elliott

Manning Elliott is a CPA firm with offices located in Vancouver, Burnaby, Surrey, and Abbotsford British Columbia, Canada. We provide personalized accounting and business advisory services to companies operating within a wide range of industries in seven major practice areas: Tax, Private Company...

Related Posts

Strengthening Equity & Inclusion Through Organizational Capacity

Our Letter to the Prime Minister

Our Letter to the Prime Minister

Culture: People First

by Vantage Point | Jun 12, 2020 | 0 comments

Letterhead Header

Rt. Hon Justin Trudeau, PC, MP
Prime Minister of Canada
House of Commons
Ottawa, ON
K1A 0A6

June 10, 2020

Subject: Increasing Federal Government Support for the Charitable and Not-for-Profit Sector

Dear Prime Minister,

We are joining colleagues across Canada to emphasize the urgency of a federal proposal to support and strengthen charities and nonprofits across the country.

In the face of our global emergency, BC's not-for-profit and charitable sector has been called on to provide a soaring level of support to the Government of Canada, its businesses, and the public. From the provision of front-line essential health services, to supporting victims of domestic violence, and deploying volunteers safely, the not-for-profit sector is vital to the safety and wellbeing of our country. But the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the not-for-profit sector needs your urgent attention and action.

Vantage Point exists to uplift and support nonprofits across BC. One of our core principles is to meet nonprofits and their leaders where they are at, adapting programs and services to reflect the capacities of the organizations we serve. We see ourselves as representing portions of the sector often left our of conversations - smaller organizations, volunteer-run or with small staff teams, organizations facing all the pressures of other business.

The not-for-profit sector in British Columbia

British Columbia's not-for-profit sector is vast in size, scope, and impact. It consists of over 25,000 societies providing immeasurable value to the economy and lives of people across British Columbia. These organizations also provide a crucial source of employment for more than 86,000 people and contributes up to $6.69 billion in programs and services across the province.[1]

Despite the fundamental impact on the quality of life for Canadians, not-for-profit organizations languish under economic policies and regulations which undermine our efforts. In 2019, the Senate report on the Canadian charitable sector found that while community-based organizations are resilient and innovative, our potential is limited by complex, outdated rules and a lack of coordinated government support.[2]

Here in British Columbia, we released the No Immunity report to highlight the early impacts of COVID-19 on BC’s charities and nonprofits.  At the time of data collection in April, of the 1,119 respondents, 23% did not think they can stay open past 6 months and 74% were experiencing reduced revenue from fundraising. As overburdened not-for-profit employees experience increasing difficulties delivering essential services, our deep concerns for the sector also grows. Our colleagues at Imagine Canada estimate the projected financial losses for registered charities alone to be between $9.5 billion and $15.7 billion.

Here is what is at stake for our sector and the Canadian public:

  • Services to racialized populations and social justice support. Urban Indigenous, Black, and immigrant communities have been particularly affected by the pandemic. Our sector is the primary provider of skills, language and literacy training, justice and social equity support, anti-racism resources and programs as well as advocacy for these communities.
  • Support for women. Charities report that domestic violence is intensifying under lockdown, with additional support needed to engage children who are experiencing violence at home. Women and their families will need additional support to find safety and support.
  • Mental health services. Whether by directly providing mental health services, or providing Canadians with a semblance of normalcy (e.g. through amateur sports or arts), our sector will be at the forefront of helping Canadians cope with the experience we have all shared.
  • Services to people with disabilities. Charities and nonprofits ensure people with disabilities have a voice through advocacy efforts and a valuable place within society through career support, social activities, training, accessibility workshops, and more.
  • Childcare services, after school programs, and day camps. These are vital to ensure parents are able to return to work. If charities and nonprofits are unable to offer these services, there will be disproportionate impacts to women and single-parent families.
  • Services to seniors. Services provided by these organizations help seniors deal with isolation imposed by the pandemic and the resultant deleterious mental and physical health consequences.
  • Environmental sustainability. These organizations are crucial for creating the kind of recovery Canadians want. From the preservation of ecosystems, to the protection of threatened species, and the development of sustainable solutions for communities, their work needs to continue.
  • Health services and support. These organizations play an important role in preventative care, matching individuals to the right services, and providing support that enables individuals experiencing health problems to enjoy a higher quality of life.

At the outset of the pandemic, our sector identified the need for a grant program to ensure that organizations can survive, adapt to changed circumstances, and position themselves to actively contribute to the recovery. The financial measures announced so far have met a portion of what is required for those who are eligible, but much remains to be done. We urge you to work with your colleagues – primarily the Minister of Finance and the Minister of Families, Children, and Social Development – to finalize and implement a grant program that recognizes the unique situation facing charities and nonprofits, the efforts they have continued to make to serve their communities in unprecedented circumstances, and the role that they can and must play in Canada’s recovery from COVID-19.

We urge you to expand the criteria used to make policy and investment beyond a narrow focus on business and employment growth. Our current policies make sense when the metrics for economic success are based on GDP growth. But if the measure of success was to maximize public wellbeing, then the focus of infrastructure stimulus investment would look very different. Under this lens, it is clear that our sector is here to support common government objectives and that we need to work closer together. Our sector is Society’s Partner in Wellbeing. We encourage you to call on our expertise to inform and improve public policy decisions in ways that maximize public wellbeing. We urge you to engage in conscientious dialogue with our sector and to work together to recover from the pandemic, build healthy communities, and a resilient economy. Investing in, working with, and supporting the sector improves the lives of all people all Canadians.We encourage you to work with our sector to develop and incorporate a national wellbeing strategy to the stimulus spending that will be required to recover from the crises our nation is facing.

We look forward to your response.

Sincerely,

Alison Brewin
Executive Director
Vantage Point

cc: Hon. Bill Morneau, PC, MP
Minister of Finance
Hon. Ahmed Hussen, PC, MP
Minister of Families, Children, and Social Development


[1] Please see infographic attached.  

[2] Mercer, T., Ratna Omidvar. (2019). Catalyst for Change: A Roadmap to a Stronger Charitable Sector. Ottawa, Ontario: Senate Special Committee on the Charitable Sector. 190.

 

 

Letterhead Footer

Author

Alison Brewin

As Executive Director, Alison Brewin is responsible for executing the Vantage Point’s mission and vision. Alison graduated with a Law Degree from the University of Victoria in 1991 and was called to the Bar in 1992. Throughout the 1990s, she worked in non-profit management, as political assistant...

Related Posts

Strengthening Equity & Inclusion Through Organizational Capacity

The Implications of Covid-19 in the Downtown Eastside

The Implications of Covid-19 in the Downtown Eastside

Culture: People First

by Vantage Point | May 28, 2020 | 0 comments

I had the pleasure of interviewing Mebrat Beyene, Executive Director of WISH Drop-in Centre Society, earlier this month, and am happy to be able to share with you what I learned throughout our conversation. We talked about the challenges residents of the Downtown Eastside and the organizations supporting them face, and the incredible work they are doing to find solutions. Below is a condensed version of the interview; I invite you to find the full version at the bottom of this page if you would like to know more about this important perspective on a core community in the Vancouver area.


As most Lower Mainland residents have no context for what it is like to be part of the Downtown Eastside (DTES) community or work closely with the residents of the DTES, I’d like to ask you a few questions to give an idea of what your work is like. Why is it crucial to be inclusive of this community? Where do we get reliable information about what is happening? And how can we show our support? So, with all that in mind, thank you for taking the time to speak with me and I’m looking forward to hearing what you have to say.

First, what does WISH stand for and how does its mandate look?

WISH’s original name is Women’s Information Safe Haven. Our mandate is to support women in street-based sex work, and we have a vision that every woman should have the opportunity to make safe, healthy, and positive choices.

Before COVID-19, what would you have said were the biggest challenges facing residents in the DTES?

Ironically, the biggest challenges are not much different. What we are seeing now is just an exacerbation of all those issues. The biggest challenges are all stemming from our collective inability to address poverty on a larger, more comprehensive scale, and the other impacts of poverty: homelessness, housing crisis, adequate supports for mental health and [physical] health (so we can address safe drug supply and the ongoing opioid crisis). We’re now just seeing them at a level that is even more dramatic and that I think people outside of the DTES are sort of paying attention to and are feeling a little bit of the shock of it now…

Your answer plays right into my next question: Getting more into our current reality, how have those challenges changed or been impacted? What I’m taking away is people are seeing how this is an issue which affects everybody as the situation becomes more dramatic.

It is an issue that affects everybody; but if we put an equity lens on everything as we typically do, it is affecting everybody differently. What we are seeing in the DTES right now is not even the effect of positive COVID results yet. It is the effects and the impacts of less access to services, supplies, sanitation, and income.

For the women we support, sex workers would have been the first people to really feel the impact of dramatic and sudden loss of income. So once again, it’s coming back to issues of poverty, racism, stigma, discrimination, criminalized communities, criminalized activity, and the harm of all those issues compounded – with the existing crises of poverty, homelessness, and the opioid crisis.

Is there an example you can give of how COVID-19 has compounded the pressures organizations are under – given the pre-existing challenges like the opioid crisis?

The opioid crisis was a huge problem to begin with, and the number of people we lost due to the opioid crisis far surpasses COVID; except this time COVID is affecting people who are not drug users, who aren’t in the DTES, not poor, not street-based sex workers. In terms of pressures compounding organizations and residents, drug use does not stop[1]. Whatever dependencies you have aren’t going to magically stop. There are fewer drugs available, or they’re harder to get or afford.

Safe drug supply has been made possible, which is revolutionary and remarkable that City Council passed [that motion]. Getting it to happen on the ground is slower. People are not able to access physicians for prescriptions or access their meds or their drugs quickly, so we are seeing people who are dope-sick and in withdrawal. They are put in even more of a desperate situation so the ability to make safe and healthy choices is getting harder.

Secondly, all the measures we have put in place for physical distancing is also having an impact on peoples’ ability to use together and to keep each other safe in case of an accidental overdose. With restrictive guest policies being mandated to contain COVID, people can’t have guests in their rooms who may have been their spotters – the person who would revive them or call for help. For sex workers who rely on trading sex for their income – and where drug use and drug acquisition might be tied in with sex work – it’s the same challenge. Not only are they cut off from their ability to make money, they are also compromised in their ability to obtain their meds and their drugs.

You mentioned a term earlier: “Dope-sick”, is that another word for withdrawal?

Yes. And it’s interesting because sometimes it can look like some of the symptoms they’re talking about with COVID. It’s been interesting to see the shift in response because these might be symptoms we deal with all the time so it’s really challenging to be able to keep light on the fact that these were emergencies we were already dealing with before COVID.

Knowing the DTES is a tight-knit community in many ways where people are dependent on each other for survival, does this look the same throughout the COVID-19 crisis? Is there anything workers are doing to promote the safety of the community specific to the pandemic (physical distancing, for example), or is this a non-option and why?

Without safe housing, and with spaces now limited, closed, or reduced in some way, there are fewer places for people to just “be” in the community. Sidewalks are more crowded. There is no physical distancing happening. I think the combination of the logistics aren’t even possible (if all the services have provided meals to-go because communal eating is now unsafe, people with to-go containers have nowhere to eat. They congregate in parks, on sidewalks, and benches). If all your services, connections, and friends are in that ten-block radius, you’re going to stay.

And to your question “are workers doing anything to promote safety…” Yeah, all of us are coming together. There are entire networks within the DTES of different groups of service providers connecting all week long around community-wide responses. We are looking at: “Are there any unused spaces that can be activated?” Empty lots which can be expanded in the same way WISH has done with our secure back lot. That’s the community-led response I’m talking about.

Is there an example of what collaboration between not-for-profits / other support services in the DTES looks like?

There are so many examples! I think we naturally collaborate and partner. Right now, what we’re seeing is quite broad and selfless despite funding that can typically risk pitting us against each other or competing for funds. But I’m seeing something rising above that and really challenging that trope and structure. We’re borrowing materials and supplies from each other. If one organization can make a purchase for another – that’s happening right now!

One great example within the last couple days: WISH had been working to get our back lot as an extension of our services and a washroom trailer out back as a much safer solution than port-a-potties (and to avoid some of the tragedies we’ve seen with the port-a-potties) but we were stuck waiting for funding. Union Gospel Mission stepped in to see if they can help fund the rental of a washroom trailer on our lot. That’s beautiful! (Since the interview, the bathroom project has been approved. WISH now has a 24/7 access washroom trailer on site.)

What could others – individuals and governments – do to help you achieve those priorities?

Don’t guess at what is helpful – just ask. Don’t say “Hey, I have this idea for a program!” [laughs]. Every single non-profit – if you provide cash donations, we can do so much more with that. If you supply the cash, we can use it in the most efficient way. If non-profits are asking for physical donations, pay attention to what kind. A lot of times out of good will people bring things down that are not helpful or that we can’t use, and we then have to deal with sorting or disposing of it, using staff time that should be directed towards delivering programs, instead.

Trust the organizations with long-standing relationships and expertise, that they will leverage your funding and get it done in the most appropriate way.

Is there anything else you want people to know I have not addressed?

I would encourage people to think about the DTES as a neighbourhood deserving as much respect, attention, and dignity as any other neighbourhood… and to think about the inconveniences and hardships people are experiencing now due to COVID may only be a tiny fraction of what the DTES experiences on a daily basis. If people are feeling a bit of panic about where their next paycheque is going to come from, and if anyone has experienced panic in this time around “Oh wow! There’s not as many things on the shelves as before,” just imagine that, times 50, every single day. I wonder if this could be an opportunity for people to have a little more humility and compassion for what it must be like to live in poverty with multiple health and safety emergencies 24/7.


[1] If someone is drug-dependent, suddenly abstaining from all use can result in dangerous or deadly withdrawal symptoms.

 

Open an accessible PDF of the full interview in a new tab here.

Author

Rowan King

Rowan takes care of the marketing and communications side of Vantage Point. He designs the newsletters you see in your inbox, edits the videos and podcasts you stream, populates the social media feeds you follow, and more! Rowan has a passion for accessibility and information collection (i.e.,...

Related Posts

Strengthening Equity & Inclusion Through Organizational Capacity

No immunity: The Impacts of Covid-19 On Our Sector

No Immunity: The Impact of Covid-19 on Our Sector

Culture: People First

by Vantage Point | May 13, 2020 | 0 comments

As of November 18, 2020, the second No Immunity survey is available until December 7, 2020. We ask every organization to select one leader to take 15 minutes to respond to the survey to support accurate results on how COVID-19 has impacted BC's not-for-profit sector.


Vantage Point exists to lift and support not-for-profits across the province. When COVID-19 hit, we immediately reignited our core purpose - to convene, connect, and equip not-for-profit leaders. We saw our history of providing training and one-on-one support in governance, planning, HR, and leadership was needed more than ever.

Another part of our team focused on the convening and connecting aspects of our core purpose. Early on, we saw the value of a sector-wide survey. As active participants in national discussions with organizations like the Ontario Non-profit Network, Imagine Canada, SaskNonprofit, Volunteer Canada, and others, it was obvious how helpful data could give perspective to our sector’s needs and experience. Alone, Vantage Point simply did not have the capacity. We could see subsectors, especially the arts community, managed to collect data about their subsectors and were beginning to communicate their findings throughout their respective communities.

In our interactions with the Vancouver Foundation and the City of Vancouver, it became clear many players were considering surveys. The Victoria Foundation joined us and with a combination of resources – human and otherwise – we collaborated to create the BC Non-Profit Impact Survey.

A special thank you to Trina Isakson and Kylie Hutchinson, who were able to support the partnership with their data and research analysis skills and produce a draft report in record time.

What have we learned?

We heard the deep need for information and support regarding funding sources and opportunities. We will leverage Vantage Point’s knowledge of funders, revenue development, and grant writing to support the sector.

COVID-19 has uncovered the impact of decades of pressures to limit spending in our organizations only to direct program delivery. The ‘overhead myth’ pushing our organizations to limit investment in contingency funds, technology, employee benefits, and stable governance is part of what has created the precariousness of our vital work.

The results show us the resiliency and optimism of this sector – although the optimism is more for our own organizations than the whole sector. As we begin to recognize the digital divide which has always existed throughout the growing use of technology, the challenges organizations have are transitions to cloud-based home offices, relying on outdated software and hardware, and bridging the gap between the technology available and the lack of capacity to access it. Clearly, we look to the private sector for support in these areas, and Vantage Point can contribute to advancing opportunities for private/not-for-profit partnership.

We also hear the unique challenges of our arts, sports, and recreational subsectors. The Arts are central to our recovery as we process the impacts of this crisis together. Sports and recreation organizations are central in keeping many of us healthy and active. They give opportunities to gather and play with our own communities and chosen families. Festivals, tournaments, events, and arts groups are designed to showcase and celebrate all British Columbians' lives. We will continue to work with umbrella organizations like the Arts Alliance to align our advocacy work to ensure our sector's full scope is understood and visible to decision-makers in the province.

And Vantage Point will seek solutions to the challenges equity-seeking groups have in participating in surveys like this. We will strive to make the needs of our most vulnerable organizations central to the dialogue. While surveys like this can tell a story, we must always pay attention to stories that fall through the cracks, supporting people with disabilities, Indigenous voices, LGBTQ2+ British Columbians, refugees and newcomers to Canada, and those marginalized by income inequality.

Thank you to everyone who was able to participate. We look forward to continuing our support of the sector in all its diversity.

Image shows Vantage Point Arrow

Author

Alison Brewin

As Executive Director, Alison Brewin is responsible for executing the Vantage Point’s mission and vision. Alison graduated with a Law Degree from the University of Victoria in 1991 and was called to the Bar in 1992. Throughout the 1990s, she worked in non-profit management, as political assistant...

Related Posts

Strengthening Equity & Inclusion Through Organizational Capacity

Our Letter to the City of Vancouver

Our Letter to the City of Vancouver

Culture: People First

by Vantage Point | Apr 24, 2020 | 0 comments

Dear reader,

We are asking not-for-profit and charitable organizations to endorse our letter asking Vancouver City Council to preserve its critical funding support for the sector. Please take a moment to add your first and last name, position title, and organization in the comment section of this page. Thank you.

Letterhead Header

Council members, City of Vancouver
Vancouver City Hall
453 West 12th Ave
Vancouver, BC
V5Y 1V4

April 24, 2020

Subject: Maintain Funding of Not-for-Profits in Vancouver - They are a vital part of sustaining our communities.

Dear Mayor Kennedy Stewart and Council Members,

We acknowledge the remarkable work the City is doing to support our communities during the unprecedented and rapidly changing environment of the COVID-19 crisis. We commend you for the thoughtful actions you have taken to protect individuals and families in the region and for advocating on their behalf with higher levels of government.

In BC, as in the rest of Canada, charitable and not-for-profit organizations are currently seeing an increased demand for their services, increased operating costs, and have lost major sources of revenue. We employ over 86,000 people across the province. We also contribute up to $6.69 billion in programs and services per year. Beyond the essential services and support we provide for our most vulnerable, our sector is also a critical engine of economic prosperity and jobs.

As we rebuild our communities, our sector's role cannot be overstated. Consider the work of:

  • WISH - supporting women in the downtown eastside who are disproportionately affected by violence, extreme poverty, and ill health. WISH is the line between life and death for some of the most vulnerable women in our community.
  • Potluck - acting as a manufacturer and distribution centre for healthy meals to residents in need in the downtown eastside.
  • All the neighbourhood houses - connecting residents who are isolated with key supports to keep seniors, families, babies, and people with disabilities healthy - and doing it in multiple languages.
  • Community-based choral societies like Highs and Lows, connecting people struggling with mental health challenges to the healing art of singing.

As a sector, our work is crucial to mitigate the evolving hardship and loss of life associated with COVID-19.

Vantage Point's commitment is to continue working with government, businesses, and our community partners to ensure the vital services we provide are available during this emergency. We want you to know this sector is currently disproportionately impacted by overlapping risks which threaten our ability to continue working to support public wellbeing and resilience.

Results of our recent province-wide survey of the sector estimates that, without a targeted investment strategy to bolster the sector, up to 22,000, and likely more, of not-for-profit employees are likely to lose their job by the end of June. Many of those in the Vancouver area. As a response, Vantage Point and our community partners have launched several initiatives to help not-for-profit organizations access federal and provincial government supports to make sure they keep their doors open and their services available.

We understand the pressures on the City to manage the unprecedented impact of COVID-19 on our communities. However, ending the supports you offer to your not-for-profit partners will only exacerbate the crisis we are currently experiencing. City of Vancouver grants in Social Planning and the Arts are an essential core support to keep key organizations open and functioning. Without our organizations, and without the funding support of the City, Vancouver would not be the resilient community it is. To this end, we urge your government to consider the following recommendations to address these crucial needs of the sector:

1. Maintain funding of not-for-profits in Vancouver and ensure emergency relief programs and funds made available to businesses also include clearly defined mechanisms to support the not-for-profit and charitable sector.
Not-for-profits and charities are seeing the same or greater revenue losses and challenges as private businesses - even their non-governmental funders are losing money and staff, creating a ripple effect. After years of dwindling funding sources and limited alternatives for undesignated funding, few organizations have cash reserves on which they can draw during a crisis.

The programming our sector provides is an essential factor to public wellbeing and there are strong financial arguments for maintaining, even increasing, your funding and other supports to the sector. The City supports not-for-profits which attract financial and human resources far beyond the dollars the City investment spends on grants.

2. Leverage mechanisms the Province recently announced to address cash flow and revenue loss challenges faced by municipal governments.
We were pleased to see the Provincial Government has offered local governments greater flexibility to borrow and carry deficits to help pay for operating expenses, such as employee salaries and other civic services. Sound financial thinking also supports investing directly in the not-for-profit sector in challenging times. Every contributed dollar supports the attraction of more dollars. The number of employees hired in Vancouver by the sector - employees paying rent, mortgages, city fees, etc. - are estimated to be in the tens of thousands. This crisis is not a time for austerity. Our sector looks forward to our continued partnership with you to maximize public wellbeing benefits through the thoughtful allocation of your investments.

3. Relax funding restrictions and provide greater flexibility to the allocation of funds.
Not-for-profit organizations experience additional pressures due to the ways they are funded. Funding agreements may stipulate outcomes for the number of participants, and these might not be met during a health crisis. There are serious implications for not-for-profits if governmental and non-governmental funders and donors reinforce expectations for outcomes or outputs, which may not be manageable, or even possible. We urge your government and municipal departments to continue to flow funds through grant and contribution programs and to emphasize flexibility in program delivery timelines and the use of these funds. We also request administrative burdens related to reporting and renewal to be minimized. Clear communication around flexibility measures would provide essential assistance for not-for-profits.

4. Ensure further measures - which provide employee assistance and help to retain employment - address the unique needs of charities and not-for-profits.
We have been pleased to see various levels of government implement mechanisms to mitigate job losses and support those who have been laid-off. However, employees in the not-for-profit sector have unique needs. Therefore, while mortgage deferrals have been a welcome respite for households affected by job losses, most not-for-profit employees are renters with average salaries 13.8% less than the provincial average. We urge you to consider how you can leverage municipal facilities and redeploy resources in ways which allow charities and not-for-profits to maintain operations, sustain facilities and infrastructure temporarily closed, and ensure capacity to reopen during the recovery period.

5. Ensure communications about emergency funds and programming refer to employers rather than businesses.
Charities and not-for-profits employ over 86,000 British Columbians. Governments' language should recognize this fact so it is clear to your staff, the public, and not-for-profits. Not-for-profit voices will ensure the needs of the not-for-profit sector, including their volunteers, workers, and constituents, are explicitly addressed in emergency preparedness response and recovery.

Your investment in not-for-profits is an investment which will save lives and aid our city in the recovery efforts. As your partner is public wellbeing, the not-for-profit sector has an unwavering pledge to work together to support your local government and our communities through this crisis and beyond.

Sincerely,

Alison Brewin
Executive Director
Vantage Point

 

Letterhead Footer

Please submit your first and last name, position title, and organization in the comments section if you would like to endorse this letter to Vancouver City Council. Thank you!

Author

Vantage Point

We are a team of passionate and dedicated not-for-profit professionals dedicated to providing not-for-profits with high quality leadership training. We are here to set you up for success. Learn more about our team at www.thevantagepoint.ca/about/our-people/

Related Posts